Issue #52 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Update June 22, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arts Digital Music Forum - East by David Katz March 3, 2007 The Digital Music Forum - East, held in the Museum of Jewish Heritage in lower Manhattan, brought together executives from major music labels, music publishing, aggregators and subscription services and new distribution channels such as cell phone companies and internet feeds. Although there were a variety of discussion panels, conversation on and off the dais focuessed on the rapidly changing digital scene, and its implications for intellectual property rights, how to make money from music in the new environment, and what new roles will the vfarious industry segments play. There was concensus on a number of issues: The issue of delivering music in MP3 format, raised recently by Steve Jobs of Apple, was felt to be a non-issue, since the implication behind this position was that removing embedded Digital Rights Management would harm both the distributor and creators of the music; increasing interoperability and portability would remove much of the music buyer's objection to DRM. New ways of monetizing music, that is, making money from the creation or distribution of music, were discussed. Various segments of the industry have conflicting requirements. For example, while singer/songwriters might be willing to distribute their music for free or in an unprotected format in order to build audiences for live performance, the non-performing songwriter gets no such benefit and must depend on sales and royalties for survival. A distinction was drawn at the Forum between musicians and entertainers, where musicians create for the love of it, and are often ignored by major labels, while entertainers are celebreties using music as a vehicle to propagate their fame. Independants and major labels differ in their access to modes of distribution. Finally, the interests of the music publisher and the record label are not identical. Music subscription plans, in which the listener pays a monthly fee for limited downloading and play rights to music haven't been overly successful, and are therefore not a promising method of monetization. Rights cost keep the subscription prices too high to be attractive to most listeners, and only a small segment of the market is willing to pay for subscriptions. Ads-based subscription services may succeed better, especially if the ads are not intrusive on the music experience. Mobile music, the direct downloading of music into cell phones and mp3 players, has become an important segment of the music business. In addition to downloading songs, packages are available that let the listener download a song, a music video of the song, a telephone ring tone made from the song, and text materials related to the song, all for a single price. Cell phone companies like Sprint and Verizon, both participants in the Digital Music Forum, have become key players in the industry. Where is the industry heading? All particpants in the Forum agreed that they really didn't know, and that technology is altering the music business so fast that business practices can't keep up. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To be notified of New York Stringer updates and new issues, click here. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New York Stringer is published by NYStringer.com. For all communications, contact David Katz, Editor and Publisher, at david@nystringer.com All content copyright 2007 by nystringer.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||